By Edmund A. M. Neugebauer, Stefan Sauerland, Abe Fingerhut, Bertrand Millat, Gerhard F. Buess
Best ecu laparoscopic surgeons have compiled the concepts of the eu organization for Endoscopic surgical procedure (EAES) during this publication. All statements are established not just at the specialists' evaluations, but additionally on a proper evaluate of the medical literature. This paintings permits readers to achieve an outline of leading edge surgical examine. All ideas describe precisely the confirmed advantage of each one surgery and approach. so much instructions comprise key statements. All chapters stick to a based structure to permit quickly id of all thoughts. In precis, this paintings presents an ideal assessment of the achievements in laparoscopic surgical procedure during the final decade.
Read or Download EAES Guidelines for Endoscopic Surgery PDF
Similar obstetrics & gynecology books
(Martin Dunitz) manhattan Univ. , big apple urban. Atlas for postgraduates curious about the surgical administration of gynecological malignancy. encompasses a complete description of nearly all of investigative and surgeries required of the gynecological oncologist. provides transparent written and pictorial guide.
The most excellent textual content in gynecology is in its Fourteenth version, completely revised and up to date and now in complete colour all through. equipped into 8 sections, this finished and basic gynecological textbook presents assistance for the administration of particular gynecological stipulations. the 1st sections conceal rules of perform and preliminary evaluate and the appropriate easy technology.
This booklet brings jointly the main updated information regarding the body structure of progestogens. This quantity addresses the bidirectional conversation among hormones, fertility, tumors, and autoimmunity. It presents the fundamental technology and scientific views of progestogens that have now not been formerly to be had in a single quantity.
This ebook addresses methodological elements of epidemiological reports on maternal drug use in being pregnant. Discussing the present resources of mistakes and the way they could produce wrong conclusions, it examines numerous epidemiological strategies and assesses their strengths and weaknesses. those refer either to the identity of results (with exact emphasis on congenital malformations) and to the categories of publicity (drug use).
Extra resources for EAES Guidelines for Endoscopic Surgery
There were no significant differences in other QoL scores. Pfeifer et al.  used an ad hoc questionnaire to assess QoL in 69 patients undergoing colorectal resection for a variety of diseases, including cancer (2b). There were no significant differences 2 months after surgery. In addition to the previous comments, some experts noted that there are no data on QoL outcomes from randomized controlled trials with total mesorectal excision. Diverticular Disease Key Points and Suggestion for QoL Assessment For diverticular disease, laparoscopic and open approaches have similar long-term results in QoL improvement (EL 2b).
Five years after surgery, Roblick et al.  asked 45 matched patient pairs to assess their QoL using the SF-36 (2b). No significant differences were found at this late point in time after the surgery. Short or intermediate-term results were not available. Groin Hernia Key Points and Suggestion for QoL Assessment Compared to open hernia repair, laparoscopic surgery (TAPP and TEP) improves QoL more quickly (EL 1a). This is also true for bilateral hernia repair (EL 1b). Long-term restoration of QoL is not different (EL 1a).
Because differences have been shown at 6 months after surgery, measurement of QoL in future trials should be done at least 6 months. Background and Evidence Five randomized and four nonrandomized trials compared laparoscopic with open hysterectomy. Ellstræm et al.  administered the SF-36 to 76 patients (1b). Three weeks after operation, the laparoscopic group had significantly better scores in physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and social functioning. At the end of follow-up, 12 weeks after surgery, there were no significant differences between the two patient groups.